--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@t...> wrote: > > I think you will find a great deal on this subject if you search the > archives. > I've also heard it can be made to disappear one way or another. > Tyler Seconded. I've heard a lot on various forums like this about this problem. Usually it's something mysterious or hard to reproduce. What this shows is that this technology is too new and WE JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND all the factors that might affect its stability. People can run all the color stability tests they want and try to accelerate the aging process to estimate how long inkjet prints will last until your prints are blue in the face, but all of those tests are based on the assumption we can already guess what all the factors are that might cause fading, or color casts or outright changes in the coated paper itself. But the reality is that WE DON'T KNOW what all the factors are that might cause this. I have one set of color prints on EEM here at work, on my cube wall, under 24/7 fluorescent lights and 2 years after they were made they look fine. I have another set at home made from the paper OUT OF THE SAME CARTON, that have been sitting in a drawer, which have taken on a greenish cast. God only knows why. This is yet another reason why I'm an advocate of having black and whte prints made photographically. Because that technolog has been around longer so its characteristics are better understood and more predictable.
Message
Re: Toxic yellow photorag!
2004-10-26 by Peter Nelson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.