on 10/31/01 2:59 AM, Julian Thomas wrote: > Paul, > What I like about the piezo driver is the profiles - absolutely vital IMO. > I'm not an EAM fan as I prefer 308 gram Photorag or William Turner - hence a > 3000 is no good to me either unfortunately! If there was a PR profile for > variable tone inks I'd be tempted. Julian I haven't been following this thread too closely so forgive me if this misses your point, but using MIS VM and Paul's curve, I find what looks good on EAM looks better on the Hahnemuhle papers. I have not tested with step wedges, or Tyler's Zee's, just images, but to my eyes no adjustments are necessary from one to the other, you'll jest have deeper blacks and a greater sense of dimension with the H. papers. It makes for a good workflow where you proof with Epson papers (I like HeavyWeight Matte as a slightly cheaper alternative to EAM, but EAM is good too) and final print on H. papers without changes to curves, profiles, dot gain, whatsoever. But that's just my perception, I'd be interested to hear if others feel otherwise... Todd PS, that's not at all to say you wouldn't miss the profiles for other papers, just that the H's all print very closely to each other, and closely to EAM and MPW.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Neutral tone FS inks for Piezo driver
2001-10-31 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.