> From: Mark Hahn [mailto:markhahn2000@...] > > ok, it isn't quite 'ideal' since, IMO, the 2200 only really *shines* > on matte paper and not on glossy. Do you mean that the 2200 is better on matte than on glossy in an absolute sense, or do you mean that when compared to a dye printer the 2200 is more of an improvement on matte paper than it is on glossy? -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:pderocco@...
Message
RE: [Digital BW] BW Printing Conclusion
2004-01-23 by Paul D. DeRocco