This is obviously a point of concern for those who may be thinking of the dual printhead approach for Canon printers (I'm one, though probably with Lyson Small Gamut inks when they become available in bulk for the Canon 9000) but I'm curious as to the source of the trouble reports. It was my impression that Canon has only been selling the printhead separately for a month or two. Has someone found the problems you describe in just that short period? I've removed my (only) printhead several times in the 8 months I've had the printer, to rinse it out under a faucet in an effort to clear persistent clogs. I never had a problem with banding or alignment after it was returned to the printer carriage and put through several cleaning cycles to refill the heads with ink. Is there some concern that the printheads available as "spares" from Canon somehow don't meet the same specs as "original equipment" and so somehow mess up the printer mechanism? I'm having a hard time imagining how this would happen, mechanically. Any details would be appreciated. I'm hoping to stick with the Canon and dual printheads for B&W and color printing, largely for its much faster printing times compared to the Epsons. But if for some reason the two heads approach doesn't really work reliably, I'll have to rethink my strategy. Cheers, Kip At 3/29/2003 01:20 AM +0000, you wrote: >I was really excited about the swappable print-heads when I saw the Canon >at Piezography's booth at PMA a few weeks ago too. Sounds like >a great solution - black and white AND color from the same printer!! > >Talk to Canon and/or anyone who's tried it though (for a long period of >time anyway) and you'll discover uncorrectable alignment problems, >tons of banding and a voided warranty.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Is Epson dead?
2003-03-29 by Kip Babington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.