Austin, If it is a printer hardware limit, how do you explain that (according to Epson) the 3000 will print to 227" from Adobe Illustrator and 1800" from Coreldraw. Also that in MacOS and 98/ME the 7500 has a limit of 90.5, but in NT/2000/XP the limit is 590.5? The 3000 has the same limits for each OS! Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@...> > > OK. So, let's see what the limits are. PS is 30,000 pixels, which has > nothing to do with the printer driver or anything else. The Epson printer > driver has a limit, which you say is 41.667"??? Where does that limit come > from? If you use a different application, is that limit different? > > Now onto the OS limit...apparently there is some limit, since the Cone > driver can't go above 44"...but Cone blamed that on Epson, and the physical > hardware...so I don't believe that is an OS limit, but an Epson > hardware/command set limit...which is probably why the driver has a limit. > > If I remember right, that 44" limit of the hardware is based on an internal > counter in the hardware. This should be easy to figure out why. The > printer steps a 1/360 of an inch, so 44 * 360 = 15840...which looks to me > like they are limited by some internal counter to 14 bits, though the paper > size command does show 16 bits can be used, but that is printer independent, > and possibly the 3000 has a firmware max of 14 bits in and of it self. > > I'll bet if we check the Epson command set, it'll say that somewhere. I did > find in the 4ch_98b command set document, that the 3000 has a maximum > printable height of 15,599 dots, assuming 1/360" dot size (p. 21). So, it > sounds to me like this is not an OS limit, but a printer hardware limit.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Optimal DPI
2003-03-02 by Bob Frost
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.