> > Let's clear a few things up. First of all, Cone's new system > > is based on Piezotone inks which have a great reputation for > > NOT clogging. > > Although I sympathize with the new idea (I've got a Canon printer..] and > second your post, this specific issue is not as simple as you state, > AFAIK. The new inks are completely new, and all pigment based, whereas > the old inks were only partly pigment based (as far as I make up from > the article, I have no experience with the inks). And pigment based inks > are more prone to clogging, as I understood from other mails, but maybe > I'm wrong in this respect. > > Best, > Ton Guiking I think the pdf press release is a little confusing because in some parts he is talking about the new canon inks and in others he is talking about the "new" piezotones which are not new. What you are referring to is the talk about the new piezotones, not the canon version. The old sundance inks had some dye, the new piezotones don't (except for some of the blacks). My suspicion is that the new CANON piezotones actually do have some dye. If you read the article carefully you will note that he never mentions specifically, he just says they are the first "pigmented" inkset set for Canon printers. I think if they were ALL pigment that he would have been more clear about it. I also find that it interesting that they are coming out with a color pigmented inkset for the canon; which I cannot help but think back to the color piezo days and wonder if they can actually pull that off and compete with Generations etc... -mh
Message
Re: Piezotone inks (was:RE: [Digital BW] Digest Number 1356)
2003-03-01 by mh <mh@toomanyartists.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.