Digital BW, The Print

Martin, 
I ask myself the same question.  I hope you get an answer.  I have an image that looks good at 11x16.5 but would be really nice at 24 x 30.  

Steadman
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: mwesley250@... 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:32 AM
  Subject: [Digital BW] Re: The B&W Print System Gap


  George,

  Thanks to you and to Ron Landucci for your input on the 7000. While 
  the 7000 sounds like the way to go if you can, I am reassured that I 
  am not missing big print quality improvement by continuing with my 
  1200.

  Is there a good correlation better the smaller printers and the 7000? 
  What I am getting at is how painless would it be to send an 11 X 14 
  from my 1200 on the paper I wanted and the file to a service bureau 
  to be printed on a 7000 at 24 X 30?

  Thanks,
  Martin



  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "George DeWolfe" 
  <dewolfe@m...> wrote:
  > Martin
  > 
  > Not sure. I think, though, that it's just the sheer size of the 
  > enlargement going from a 55PN negative to a film scanner that 
  > can take it that high. If the 3000 were 24" wide you'd have the 
  > same problem.
  > 
  > George
  > 
  > > George,
  > > 
  > > Do you feel this is a result of the quality of how the 7000 lays 
  > down 
  > > ink, the increase in print size or both.
  > > 
  > > Martin


  If you do not wish to belong to Digital B&W, The Print, you may
  unsubscribe by sending an email to:
  DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com



  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]