Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: PiezoTone Fade Data (was [piezoBW] New file uploaded to piezography3000)

2002-11-07 by flyfishingusa2002

Paul, 
Are you suggesting that the errors in Jon Cones results might be 
deliberately biased towards his inks? 
I personally wouldn't trust anything that he publishes until it is 
verified by a independant source such as your own. 
Jon Cones pruducts have never quite come up to his promises along 
with his after sales support. 
I am happy with the MIS FSN for the time being, my  Epson 2200 is 
also producing some fine B/W prints.

Keep up the good work.


Barry

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@v...> wrote:
> Robert,
> 
> You wrote:
> 
> >Finally a manufacturer published actual test results.
> 
> It is good to see some data.  I've always liked the fact that MIS 
published
> its RIT test results for the MIS Archival inks.
> 
> It looks like there may be an error in the MIS FS delta E 
calculation in the
> fade results Cone Editions released.  The FS K faded less than the 
Portfolio
> black, yet is listed as having a higher delta e.
> 
> I'm also not sure about note 3 on the "Test Condition."  It says,
> "Lightfastness: Irradiation UV (Xe) 10,000 Kj/m2/200 hours."
> 
> If the lamp was strong UV, then I wonder if the results correlate 
well with
> actual lighting.  Most of us are oriented to indoor display, where 
the UV
> from fluorescent lights or window-filtered (thus no deep UV) light 
is the
> main problem.  Unlike the outdoor signage market, I don't think we 
have that
> much of a UV problem with our prints.
> 
> I'm a little surprised that the carbon sepia did not do better.  I 
would
> have thought that an ink that was supposed to be pure carbon would 
fade less
> than inks that have some color pigments in them to get the tones 
that are
> popular.
> 
> I'll run my own tests as samples are provided.
> 
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com
> ______________________________________
> 
> From: piezography3000@y...
> Reply-To: piezography3000@y...
> Date: 7 Nov 2002 03:12:17 -0000
> To: piezography3000@y...
> Subject: [piezoBW] New file uploaded to piezography3000
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> This email message is a notification to let you know that
> a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the piezography3000
> group.
> 
>   File        : /400 Hour Xenon tests/preliminary-xenon.pdf
>   Uploaded by : piezobw <piezobw@c...>
>   Description : 400 hours on EPSON EAM
> 
> You can access this file at the URL
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/piezography3000/files/
> 400%20Hour%20Xenon%20tests/preliminary-xenon.pdf
> 
> [cut and paste the last part of the URL]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.