I believe that David is entirely correct in his assessment. The overwhelming posts on this thread are about MIS inks. I understand that I might engender some criticism when I state that perhaps the title of the group should be changed to reflect the emphasis on MIS products. There might be another group that is a bit broader in emphasis and might be more properly included in the original title. In so doing those who do not use MIS products, and have no immediate plans to do so, could view the MIS thread as desired. Simply a thought not meant to inflame those who use and recommend the MIS products. Elliot From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:55 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] MIS INKSUPPLY.... This is not an MIS specific group. Did you think it was? No. I didn't think that. But the majority of the conversations about specific inks do seem to be about MIS inks. Didn't mean to mislead. David Kachel ___________________ Artist-Photographer Fine B&W Photographs WEBSITE: www.davidkachel.com <http://www.davidkachel.com> BLOG: thetransparentphotographer.com EMAIL: david@... <mailto:david@...> PO Box 1093 Bisbee, AZ 85603 (520) 366-4181
Message
RE: [Digital BW] MIS INKSUPPLY....
2016-07-21 by Dr. Elliot Puritz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.