On 08/14/2013 06:47 PM, Mark Savoia wrote: > BTW, we all have our idea of what colors colors are, like describing the > blue of the sky is blue, pretty impossible in words. So green to you > might not be green to somebody else. I am guilty of this too by making > my comment to you that silver prints are not green (to me). > > Mark > http://www.stillrivereditions.com I am curious about that too. Did taste shift in time and more with the digital tools we have today? How linear were the Lab a an b values along the tone range of analogue prints then. It would at least be nice to add the spectral plots of analogue B&W papers to SpectrumViz. Properly developed prints etc. That way we could have a more objective tool to compare the paper white color. I have only access to prints at least 30 years old which is not a good source given OBA degradation etc. Kodak and other companies must have archived spectral plots somewhere I think. I do have some old reviews of analogue B&W papers, must check what they have in information but do not recall even a Lab number for the paper whites. Last time I looked I was amazed that nobody in the seventies seemed to care about OBA content in the papers. Just one reference of OBA content. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst Dinkla http://www.pigment-print.com/spectralplots/spectrumviz_1.htm December 2012: 500+ inkjet media paper white spectral plots.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] More neutral 100% Eboni Carbon print on Arches
2013-08-14 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.