Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: grainy appearance on watercolor papers

2013-07-14 by Pete Bergstrom

David,

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:46 AM, David Kachel <david@...> wrote:

> From:  Don
>
> "That's absolutely false. The art papers made today by Arches, Fabriano,
> Canson, etc. aren't the same as the papers made in the past, even a decade
> or so ago."
>
> I don't follow your logic. You are claiming that watercolor papers are not
> consistent, therefore coated papers must be reliable?
>
>

Please reread what Don wrote. All 4 paragraphs are important and each has
key information to address this topic.

>I'll stick with watercolor.

That's fine, but don't kid yourself that the sizing on art papers is
superior for longevity than the coating on good inkjet papers. It may be,
or it may not and it may be both over a relatively short period of time.
Both Don and Eric are specifically saying that these things change without
warning and that the past couple decades have seen the papers change a lot.

Pete


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.