Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Glossy BW

2012-08-12 by Paul

MIS also has blended, monotone, glossy compatible inksets. They're fine for many applications, but for my work, I stopped using these approaches.

For those who want more control, virtually no separation in wide format printers, and the ability to have the best longevity, I'm just pointing to an approach that may give them that.

It's a big market with lots of different levels of interest and expertise.  Most B&W photographers have clearly just settled on the Epson or other OEM "Advanced B&W" type of approach.  These are fine also, but I try to find the best for the least $$.  No one size fits all in this market.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, David Keenan <ausdlk@...> wrote:
>
> I rarely butt into these conversations but these this all sounds SO
> complicated, no offense to Paul, et al.
> 
> Why aren't you just buying one of the glossy compatible Piezography
> inksets? Put in the inks, use of of the available curves (or have one made
> if you use an exotic paper), and make great prints with NO, NONE gloss
> differential.
> 
> All this code like 5K+LC, etc. sounds like stuff for scientists, not
> photographers wanting to make exhibition quality prints.
> .
> Dave.
> 
> --
> See my 2012 Picture A Week (PAW) Gallery
> <http://www.dlkphotography.com/paw>originally begun in 2007.
> Please join my photography mailing
> list<http://dlkphotography.us2.list-manage2.com/subscribe?u=3d9dfbb5b18c4817532a37b90&id=4dd441d8fe>
> .
> Become a collector. Purchase selected prints here <http://bit.ly/JHfpMb>.
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.