Jimbo, What is the difference between the LS-5000 and the more commonly available 5000 ED scanner. Mark > The 5400 at the time it was introduced was a good move... Nikon's scanners > at that time fell a bit short.. This prompted Nikon to redo it's scanners > and they raised the bar considerably.. So constructively if one chooses to > go after a film scanner of this type the LS5000 would be the better of the > two choices. > > jimbo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: andy bessette > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 10:54 AM > Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re:Panic mode: no more affordable 35mm > scanners. > > > > Sorry, > > but the 5400 II was the last one by Konica Minolta. > > Andy > > Lew Schwartz schreef: > > Is the Minolta scanner still being made? I don't see it at B&H or > Adorama. > > No Minolta scanner is made anymore. No Minolta camera either :-) > The 5400 was the best model of the Minolta range... > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Panic mode: no more affordable 35mm scanners.
2010-08-27 by mhaffey@crocker.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.