--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, Stephanie <sellison-unix@a...> wrote: > why I should by a Roland amp. Is it the quality, really, or just the name > brand recognition? Is a Roland really better than a Behringer? Steph, I'll tell you what I know and have heard. Roland amps do sound pretty good in my experience, but they don't have a lock on decent sound. There's no reason why a Yamaha, JBL, or any number of other serious music-industry amps won't strike you as just as good or better. Building an amp at a certain price point is hardly brain science these days. Build quality and attention to detail (not cutting corners in parts) are often the distinguishing characteristics. So far as Behringer is concerned, as I've written before in an attempt to be funny, the company appears to have more suits in their legal closet than Cher does in her backstage one. It has often been taken to task for stealing patents, Mackies' most notably, if memory serves. The reliability track record isn't stellar, either, though it tends to be hit or miss. A few people in this board are happy with the mixers that they've bought. Again, technically, many of these products are fairly simple designs; most of them are going to work okay. Ed
Message
Re: Opinions on Roland amps
2003-07-18 by liberatusvirus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.