Scott, I can't argue with you there. Uniformly, the cymbal sounds within modules, as well as the physical triggers themselves, leave much to be desired. A lot of people who otherwise use e-percussion do not trust e-cymbals when they seriously record. I'm sure that I don't have to go into detail about what acoustics do that electronics cannot, at least at this relatively early stage of the game. That said, though the cymbal samples within modules cannot be altered to sound like your favorite acoustic line, usually you can find a couple of rides, layered or not, and crashes that are pretty good if properly set up. Finding the right decay and frequency cutoff are crucial--that is, after gain and min. velocity are settled. Though the gum rubber pads have definitely come a long way, their feel, and perhaps even electronic response, are still lacking. Stereo cymbals (triggering on edge via a rim switch and on bow via a piezo), which are the domain of gum rubber, are particularly finicky, often forcing a change in playing technique and always risking the occasional drop-out or unintended voice/choke. The Pintech Zenbal 14" round cymbals are probably the best of the lot, especially at the price, since they swing and trigger as expected most of the time. Once you get past the Roland CY-6, the rest of the Roland line is pretty reliable as well, although the price is difficult to justify. To my mind, though, gum rubber is tough to swallow as a hi hat cymbal if you spend a lot of time riding the hi hat (I do). In my opinion, the e-cymbals with the best feel--the ones that behave most (not completely) like acoustics--are the Harts and the Visu-lites. Unfortunately, the otherwise great Hart Ecymbal II 16" bronze ride (triggering via piezo on both bow and bell) doesn't appear to mate well with Yamaha modules; nor does the brass hat. The crashes (single-zone piezo), which are not bronze but coated, do, though over time the veneer starts to flake. The Visu-lite line of cymbals (dual piezo bow/bell or single piezo w/choke) is composed of durable acrylic. They love Yamaha, and their touch is as much like "real" cymbals as the Harts. I don't know whether the effect is partly paychological because of that extraordinary feel, but they also seem to make the Yamaha cymbal samples sound better (I'm not the only one who's said as much), maybe by transmitting a more robust signal across the bow and/or bell. The do have a more delicate way of mounting the triggers, leaving the heavy hardware off the cymbal proper. I've said enough about the Visu-lite hi hat assembly on this board. If you aren't aware of it, the cymbals work on an acoustic stand, opening and closing with full variability, just like the "real" thing. I left a file about it, w/pictures, in the Files section, but you could also check it out at Drumbalaya.com or Visu-lite.com. Sorry about being so long-winded, and redundant. It's an important topic that can profit from as much input as we all give it. Although the e-cymbal situation is far from ideal, options exist to bring it closer to what many of us prefer to hear and feel. Ed --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, sboehmer <SBoehmer@n...> wrote: > I was wondering if any of you use Acoustic Cymbals, High-hats etc ...? > > I went to a percussion workshop and started to miss the versatility of the > acoustic kit that I learned on. There are some things that the DTXpress does > not do well ... especially cymbal or high-hat sounds. > > Any input would be greatly appreciated > > Scott
Message
Re: Using Acoustic parts
2003-06-06 by liberatusvirus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.