Establishing a good set of sound categories, and a standard nomenclature for the filenames IS still quite important. It will be a HUGE asset as the list of user files grows. It will also make keeping such a database doable. We have tons of EX5 format files. The EX5 has categories built into the file names, however, some people don't use them, or don't use them well. As a result, it's a lot more difficult prospect for us to create a *useful* database of EX5 patches (or "Voices", as Yamaha calls them). We're working on it, though. I thought of one other little problem regarding Evolver FILE nomenclature with respect to the database you'd like to make, Ravi. Given that SOME files will be BANK files, we'll need to be sure that all BANK files come with a complete patch list, too. Patch names on the patch list would need to use the same format nomenclature as the single patch file names. Your database would then need a minimum of four fields: 1) The three part patch name (category.sound_name.location) 2) The three part file name in which the patch exists (category.collection_name.location) 3) The patch author 4) Date authored Ideally, you'd want to break items 1 and 2 into separate component fields, giving you a total of 8 fields. Actually I guess you *could* drop the "category" and "location" part of the FILE name in the database, since it would essentially be redundant with the info for each of the individual patches. You'd need to keep that info in the actual name of the file, though. BTW, this discussion is getting a bit fragged (multiple threads/emails). Once this project gets underway, it might be easier to follow if we make a single project specific thread in the EX5Tech forums. Of course, that's only if everyone's agreeable. I don't want to risk losing participants if some of them dislike forums. And again, if we run out of space in the Yahoo group, or have any other problems with people uploading files, I can get them via email and host them at ex5tech.com. Ski www.ex5tech.com EX5Tech Evolver forum: http://www.ex5tech.com/ex5ubb_cgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=forum&f=23 --- In DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Sharma" <noision1@h...> wrote: > It seems that a patch collection instead a contest is more palatable. That > is cool that a contest is unnecesary to have people contribute. > > Even if there are eventually whole banks of sounds made, I would prefer that > we also keep a database of all the sounds as singles and with whatever > category naming structure we agree upon. I know that I rarely enjoy throwing > in a whole bank at a time, but do enjoy "browsing" through individual > patches and grabbing what I want. > > Ravi > > > > > > > >From: not known <spectralab1@y...> > >Reply-To: DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com > >To: DSI_Evolver@yahoogroups.com > >Subject: Re: [Evolver] Re: Patch Contest / User Forum Soundset > >Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 22:07:55 -0500 (EST) > > > >I've got plenty of patches I'd be willing to throw > >into a User set. I'm one of those who is reluctant to > >participate in contests, but I am quite inclined to > >contribute to something like this... > > > >_____________________________________________________________________ _ > >Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca > > > _________________________________________________________________ > STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Message
[Evolver] Re: Patch Contest / User Forum Soundset
2003-01-09 by Ski <ex5tech@excite.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.