ummm, forth... hadn't thot about it for a while, but there was polansky & burk's HMSL (hierachical music specification language) written in forth, and i think a java version that followed... as dr.m. described, a bunch of routines that were compositionally useful as building blocks... seems like eons ago. a whole different universe than what we're talking about here. but those frog peak guys did some nice stuff. but not to stray... MBasic, just the ticket, yass yass... onward! bbob --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "john mahoney" <jmahoney@...> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "drmabuce" <drmabuce@...> > Subject: Re: Microprocessors in analog modules > [snip] > > > > i think it's worthwhile to ask how many folks would prefer graphic > > development to low-level MBASIC or C or Forth coding.*** > > The number might justify the effort of a (ie) graphic-to-MBASIC > > compiler .... to someone! > > ... > > ***and then just to be a smartass we should ask how many people would > > prefer to develop direcly in assembler .... or.... OR THE PROCESSOR > > CODE.... WOW!!!!!! that stuff's REALLY FAST!!!!! > > uh.... > > MBASIC still gets my vote BTW > > ;'> > > > As one wag put it, lower level languages give you the answer quicker, but > later. ;-) > > MBASIC on the Atom Pro is fast enough for most of our purposes here. If a > need arises for particular routines to written in a lower level language, > I'd be willing to give it a go. Coding "to the bare metal" can be fun in > limited amounts. > > Forth was brought up on the Synth-DIY list, as I recall. It's pretty obscure > to most folks but quite popular for embedded systems. A CVS* is an embedded > system, no? The cool thing about Forth is that hardcore programmers can > create a set of custom commands which can then be used by everyone else. So, > the pioneers have a steep slope to climb, but they are able to build a lift > for everyone else -- in theory, anyway. (Note: I am not suggesting that > Forth be the language of choice, especially since I don't know it! Heh... > MBASIC works, and it's pretty darn fast on the Atom Pro.) > > Not to get all off-topic and nostalgic, but... my first languages were the > Apple ][ BASICs (Integer and Applesoft) and 6502 machine code and assembler, > more or less at the same time, way back in 19mumblemumble... > -- > john > > > * CVS = Computer Voltage Source >
Message
Re: programming languages [forth]
2006-03-09 by data2action
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.