Now that's unfortunate, considering that I will be referring to the PSIM extensively. It is the logical test bed for ideas here. That said, one of the purposes of this group is to come up with an alternative to the PSIM given its limitations and its lack of availability, so references to it may wane as time goes on. By the way, I have at least one program that I would like to post but I understand that to be problematic given Brice's insistence on GPL. Can somebody explain what we can post here and whether or not we're violating some of that license? I have a program that implements algorithmic composition, after a fashion... Mike --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, David Kronemyer <dkronemyer@...> wrote: > > I am getting very tired of references to the PSIM, seeing as how only a few > people have them and it is ³vapor ware² as far as the rest of us are > concerned. While well-intentioned, I think that Larry¹s proposal is too > complicated. In my view, we should stick with something that will appeal to > the broadest constituency first, then, refine later. From my perspective, > the Basic Atom Pro is the way to go a flexible platform that readily will > succumb to subsequent user modifications. DAVID >
Message
Re: Reference Platform?
2006-03-07 by Mike Marsh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.