"Gary Chang" <gchang@...> wrote: > > > Dave didn't seem to have the same problem with the quantization, so > there are two versions - gc-sah-sr-nq-djb (nq for no quantization) and > gc-sah-sr-j-djb (q for quantized). (Dave, I hope that I put up the > right versions of these guys!) > I should have corrected my spelling... Of course, the quantized version is gc-sah-sr-q-djb - not j, as in the original message...
Message
Re: About gc-sah-sr-nq-djb.... errata
2006-09-26 by Gary Chang