For calibration you need to measure an amplified value, even if the amplification is 1. You can't do that by grounding the signal. That just sets the zero null point. John Loffink The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site http://www.wavemakers-synth.com > -----Original Message----- > From: ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Larry T. > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 8:03 PM > To: ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [ComputerVoltageSources] Re: resistor matching, was RE: > Calibrated Inputs > > Thinking about it, I believe this would also account for varrainces in > the ADC's thenselves would'nt it? > > Larry T. > > --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "Larry T." <larry@...> > wrote: > > > > HI All > > > > Given that I'm not an EE or even a decent hobby designer, why is this > > calibration such a problem? Why not use trim pots and the Analog > > inputs themselves as follows: > > > > First: Ground the input to be calibrated. (This should ALWAYS be a > > constant of 0 right?) > > > > Second: Run a small program on the modules CPU to continously return > > the value of the converters input via the serial port to a 'telnet' > > session on a PC or Mac, followed by a Carriage Return and a Line Feed. > > (This will give you a continous dump of the converters value down the > > screen.) > > > > Third: Adjust the timpot until you get 0.00... as the returned value, > > and it stays that way for a minute or two. > > > > Would'nt this handle it with NO tools of any kind except those we > > already need to use the module anyway? > > > > Larry T. > >
Message
RE: [ComputerVoltageSources] Re: resistor matching, was RE: Calibrated Inputs
2006-03-26 by John Loffink
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.