Personally, I'd rather have the 8 I/O than Speakjet on board. I can hook my Speakjet to my PSIM if I really needed it... Mike --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "Grant Richter" <grichter@...> wrote: > > Hit "unwrap lines" above so this doesn't look jumbled. > > OK, to clarify the difference between Basic Atom Pro 24M and 28M. > > The pinouts are the same as far as power pins etc. So a socket can accept either 24 or 28 > version without needing jumpers. Just more I/O pins are added at then end. > > The 32K of EEPROM is 32K BITS, which is only 4096 BYTES. Still very handy. See the "Read" > and "Write" commands in the software manual (quote from Nathan). > > The additional 4 pins added on the bottom are 4 more A/D inputs, so the device could > support 8 analog voltage inputs with no multiplexors. Whoo HA! One option is to decicate > some of the 4 analog inputs to fixed functions like cursor control or some kind of user > interface? > > Like using a knob with 10 hardware detents to select 10 software options? > It might be possible to support some kind of performance interface using a force sensing > resitor? The processor is there to od the math to extract the X,Y and Z data. > > That makes me want to put two sockets for quad DACs with a chip select to give 8 voltage > outputs. > > This may come at the expense of some digital funtions. I may have to sacrifice a pin for > chip select. Are we FOR SURE dedicated to having a Speakjet socket on the main CVS PC > board? Or would we rather have 8 analog inputs and 8 analog outputs? > > The Speakjet is cute, no doubt about it. A voice synthesizer is a bunch of fun, even if the > highest frequency out is 8 KHz. I wish that new MOOG in a chip was further along. I really > like the idea of having some kind of synth right on the PCB for the circuit bending. build it > into a manakins head crowd, They make me smile. > > ALSO: > > He is hand building prototypes of the 40 pin version of the Basic Atom Pro 40M now. This > is upgraded to a 20 Mhz clock (from 18) and uses the bigger 3687 part rather than current > 3664. He says at least 6 months to a years till it is available but recommends using a 40 > pin footprint for any new board. The Basic Micro (PIC based) 40m can be bought now. > > Slower, but maybe with a enough I/O pins to read a MIni-Wave Prom for complex envelope > storage. > > --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "John Loffink" <jloffink@> wrote: > > > > Hmmm, I missed that since it is only on the web page description. It would > > be nice if they published the spec for the 28M device, since they are > > selling it. That needs to be considered for the CVS designs, because you > > need to know which pins are allocated for memory access. > > > > John Loffink > > The Microtonal Synthesis Web Site > > http://www.microtonal-synthesis.com > > The Wavemakers Synthesizer Web Site > > http://www.wavemakers-synth.com > > > > >
Message
Re: Update from Nathan at Basic Micro
2006-03-17 by Mike Marsh
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.