--- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "Grant Richter" Nice update on the AtomPro24. > The Speakjet is cute, no doubt about it. A voice synthesizer is a > bunch of fun, even if the highest frequency out is 8 KHz. I have a SpeakJet on my PSIM and I have failed to ever find a real use for it. It's fun but a pain to program. Also, interfacing to it via software serial is a pain because interrupts have to be disabled. The programming would be easier if we were to include a TTS256 along with it. Perhaps this is an opportunity to make the SpeakJet an optional PCB. It also requires filtering and gain which takes up real estate. One possibility is to continue to extend the MIDI sysex. We could pick a different ID and use this to wrap the text for the TTS256. This would be much easier to program since you can send nice string text to it. A microcontroller to interface to the TTS256 would be a bit more difficult since we'd be dealing with different baud rates. Perhaps this would be the time to use the larger AVR controllers with increase ram size. Just a thought. I personally don't think the Speakjet is worth the real estate on the main PCB. > I wish that new MOOG in a chip was further along. I really like > the idea of having some kind of synth right on the PCB for the > circuit bending. build it into a manakins head crowd, They make > me smile. The AVR synth is a possibility. It's a single chip + external DAC that would interface directly to the MIDI. I have one. The filter is a bit lame. One would have to rewrite portions of the code to encode all of the potentiometer values and switches (I assume we don't want 8 more pots and 15 switches) into a sysex message. Maybe it's time we buy our own MIDI ID :) Dave
Message
Re: Update from Nathan at Basic Micro
2006-03-16 by djbrow54
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.