I don't care so much whether there are goto's or not. I do appreciate comments, however. I've picked up some of other people's code with literally no comments. Pretty hard to figure out, adapt, and enhance. As to performance, this thing is pretty zippy. I wouldn't worry too much about speed. And, someday maybe we can figure out how to get the assembly mode to work. Dave --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh" <michaelmarsh@...> wrote: > So, just to start the conversation, I vote to keep the main loop as > small as possible through the use of subroutines and functions. > Don't use goto if you can avoid it. I realize the performance > issues here, but unless it is absolutely clear that the stack > overhead is hindering an algorithm, I suggest modularity. Both > for readability and standardization purposes.
Message
Re: Software framework
2006-03-10 by djbrow54
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.