If I could just chime in here, it¹s crazy to mount anything to the PCB except for wires. A few good twists (as in knobs) or push-pulls (as in plugs) and they¹re history. For lack of a better expression, they ³torque out² (an old surfing term). This is why e.g. Whirlwind stage boxes (with which I have too much familiarity) tend to fall apart quickly all the connectors are PCB mounted. DAVID On 3/10/06 1:49 PM, "Grant Richter" <grichter@...> wrote: > First, no offense to Chris for an excellent question. > > Don't talk to me about "no screw holes in the faceplate" that is why you don't > see Wiard > modules in MOTM format. That idea is insulting to any designer. > > Spend your time thinking about MUSIC, forget the g*dd*mn screwholes, get some > therapy > for your out of control OCD behavior, how many times do you wash your hands a > day?????????????????? (loud hissing of steam escaping from ears). > > I apologize for the rant, silly limitations really annoy me. > > There is no advantage to ANY panel mounted components being in hard copper on > the PC > board. > > What if someone wants to use it for controlling dimmer packs for a hobby > theater? > Then the board would be bench top mounted horizontally and the pots would be > slide > pots. It could support both 0-10 volt packs and the MIDI controlled ones. > > What about using it to control servo laser scanners for a laserium light show? > (those are > voltage outputs to current drivers) > > What if all the pots are force sensing resistors built into a dancers suit? > > What about if it is used for squib control to light the "Burning Man" on fire > when > Interstellar Overdrive reaches the climax? > > OK, those are meant to be humorous examples, but also practical applications. > > I don't see an anvantage favoring any mounting position or potentiometer type, > spacing or > placement. I would just use the Wiard pigtail pot assembly method. That is > each pot, > switch or whatever has a dedicated 0.100 KK connector. You can always solder > directly to > the PC pads and skip the connectors. > > I would use the extra space for as much perf board area as possible for > hanging more > experimenters chips, sensors, high current servo drivers etc. > > We will have holes in the right spots for that MOTM metal bracket thingy. Can > sombody > tell me what that spacing and hole size is? > > A 4 x 6 board will fit in a Frac-Rac. Is 6-7 inches too deep for MOTM and > Doepfer racks? > > > > > --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, xamboldt <xamboldt@...> wrote: >> > >> > Or... if pots aren't PCB-mounted, what panel components should be? >> > MIDI Jacks? DIN? LEDs? We've already heard that DIN might not be >> > something everyone would want... >> > >> > Would there be room for 4 pots and MIDI I/O? >> > >> > -Chris >> > >> > On Mar 10, 2006, at 3:10 PM, xamboldt wrote: >> > >>> > > Can of worms warning! >>> > > >>> > > Should the PCB be laid out so as to allow PCB-mounted pots for >>> > > perhaps 4 or 6 of the controls? Different front panel formats could >>> > > be allowed for by simply doing point-to-point wiring instead of PCB >>> > > mounting the pots. The difficulty comes in deciding which format >>> > > would be used to dictate the spacing of holes for the PCB-mounted >>> > > pots. Both Blacet and MOTM have standards we could appropriate for >>> > > PCB-mounted pots. The CVS' pots (as spelled out by Grant) are grouped >>> > > in functional units of 4, and that is the typical max vertical >>> > > allowance of pots on an MOTM panel. Blacet has up to 6 maximum, but >>> > > plenty of designs have fewer pots. >>> > > >>> > > I guess someone had to bring it up.... :) >>> > > >>> > > -Chris >>> > > >>> > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > I think we can use the Metalbox style 1900H knobs and Alpha pots >>>> > > > for Frac-Rac. >>>> > > > The jack spacing should accept either Switchcraft (Blacet) or >>>> > > > 16PJ135 (Wiard) jacks. >>>> > > > The 16PJ135 jacks wire up very neatly because of the ground tangs >>>> > > > being in-line. >>>> > > > The knurled nuts are designed to be assembled with fingernails, so >>>> > > > that is one less tool >>>> > > > you need. >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > SPONSORED LINKS > > Music instrument stores > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Music+instrument+stores&w1=Music+instrume > nt+stores&w2=Electronic&w3=Instruments&w4=Module&c=4&s=74&.sig=sl1GY0kdfizgobJ > LyCnG4g> Electronic > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Electronic&w1=Music+instrument+stores&w2= > Electronic&w3=Instruments&w4=Module&c=4&s=74&.sig=lQYNIdCzB9Es_s-ln81AvQ> > Instruments > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Instruments&w1=Music+instrument+stores&w2 > =Electronic&w3=Instruments&w4=Module&c=4&s=74&.sig=e6Jlo4KGQihWioYCcIZjjQ> > Module > <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Module&w1=Music+instrument+stores&w2=Elec > tronic&w3=Instruments&w4=Module&c=4&s=74&.sig=sPALVFXECM0JfHcmogn8UA> > > > > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS > > * Visit your group "ComputerVoltageSources > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ComputerVoltageSources> " on the web. > * > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > * ComputerVoltageSources-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:ComputerVoltageSources-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe > > > * > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [ComputerVoltageSources] Re: Trial Faceplate Layout
2006-03-10 by David Kronemyer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.