--- In Andromeda_A6@y..., "ARTMAZE + ASHERA \(A Wright\)" <awright@N...> wrote: > Basically if you can not tell the diffrence between DSP and analog then go > ahead an get those units.... > Personally, I would not change my A6 for ANY synth today in the market.... > > > Hi all, > > > > Ok, I've heard a lot about the A6 and have played with it in my local > > muziq shop. But, from this, I can't tell if it's really (and I mean > > really really) worth $3K (US)! Now, for around $3K, I can get a > > Virus b AND a Waldorf Q! (For $5K I can throw in a Supernova II.) > > Can one A6 compete with both of these running simultaneously? Is > > this a fair way to look at it? > > > > zensufi > > > > That's just it. Without having all of them to a/b how do I know? Ages ago I had a couple of analogs, but I certainly don't remember how phatt their sounds was. The Vb, Q, and SnII seem to have a lot more features than the A6, not to mention more poly. They all sound really great at the store too! Now, using one synth for what I do would be a real pain. So, would you say that the A6 shouldn't be your only synth? If not, what's a good partner for it? zsk
Message
Re: Is It Really Worth $3K (US)
2002-03-19 by zensufikabala
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.