Each has its place. R-2R networks take much less filtering. Response speed is faster. Parts count is higher and it may take parts with some precision. PWM is (often) low parts count UNLESS you try to reconstruct signals that are too close to the PWM repetition frequency. Then, you can need multiple-pole filters that require op-amps or more. Jim On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:18:34 +0530 "Anurag Chugh" <lithiumhead@msn.com> wrote: > why only PWM?.. why not use an R2R ladder instead with > precision resistors... > i know they would hog a whole PORT but arent they easier > to implement ?? > and they can do DC output values too... a simple opam in > front (voltage follower) will boost current output too... > > i am sure most people dont use R2R... but please tell me > why?? i know there must be a reason... > > Anurag --------------------------------------------------------------- The Think Different Store http://www.thinkdifferentstore.com/ For All Your Mac Gear ---------------------------------------------------------------
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] PWM
2006-01-09 by Jim Wagner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.