AVR-Chat

On 23 Aug 2005 at 9:12, Dennis wrote:

> Not that I disagree with you, however, look at the RETI for th 8051. Also, check
> out the RET and RETI instruction explanantion is the instruction set manual.
> Both of the latter use the same stack operation implying they function the same.
> RET returns to the instruction following the CALL, RETI does not.

	Indeed it does. The RCALL is assumed. It can be anywhere in the program.

 
> I've changed my code to accomodate the RETI. Doesn't make much sense to have
> infinite loops.

	Why not?  I use them very often.