At 08:45 AM 6/8/2005, Paul Maddox wrote: >Dave, > > > Then we have an even shorter variant possible: > > But, I maybe should have put the table option out as "obvious". > > Ok, what if I say "no tables"? > >what are you? a sadist? >I guess this isn't a 'real world' application, but, more of a question of "I >wonder how you'd do this?" I think I said that :) Interestingly, with this latest version, we are approaching the hardware based solution with two instructions and eight wires, as far as speed.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Challenge
2005-06-08 by Dave VanHorn