Dave VanHorn wrote: > At 06:39 PM 3/30/2005, Graham Davies wrote: > > > >>--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Dave VanHorn <dvanhorn@d...> wrote: >> >> >>>... if there's no operational >>>difference, why would the customer >>>differentiate? >> >>I'm kind of surprised to have got to this point in the discussion. I >>thought my point would have been taken and now I think I'm just going >>to state the obvious and nobody will remember how we got here and what >>the hell I'm going on about. >> >>The reason you care about design quality is that you can trust it. A >>poor quality design may work most of the time for some people and all >>of the time for most people. > > > I know that. Remember, I do this sort of thing for a living too. > But, when the customer is looking at the web page, deciding which to buy, > you need to give him something to hold on to, to make the right decision. > > I have gone to the point of adding lead weights in some products to make > their perceived value higher. > > The issues you are talking about are all things you discover (or not) after > the purchase decision has been made. > > >>But, when you get into a tight spot you >>want to be able to trust your tools. You want tools that are designed >>to work in every reasonable situation. You want a JTAG interface that >>keeps on working if there is a lot of noise on the supply and does not >>inject noise into a circuit that is sensitive to supply noise. You want >>the interface to produce absolutely no EMI and to be insensitive to EMI >>when the test system generates it. The Atmel JTAG ICE probably meets >>these criteria. For $300 it should. If you don't want to pay $300, you >>might still prefer a good design to a shoddy one. > > > For one, I wasn't aware of these differences before I bought my olimex > units, or all other things being equal, I would not have gone that way. > Put the data on your web site! Show both boards, and explain the differences. > Have someone test the operating voltages and noise immunity. (it's better > if it comes from a third party) > I'd be happy to review your unit, if you like, or I'm sure there are others > who are able and willing. I can offer to do independent testing, as I have just tested a few programmers for other chips (damn Pic's) Lol Regards, Kat.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: JTAG Interface ...
2005-03-31 by Kathy Quinlan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.