I use
Bascom for real, production quality, code without any problems. It's fast and
the output is as good as I can write in assembler for general
programming.
If you
really need to inspect its output you can generate an Atmel Studio compatible
.OBJ file and load that into studio for full debugging and a commented
disassembly listing.
Brian
-----Original Message-----Hi,
From: Geo [mailto:buggies@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 29 March 2005 17:05
To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [AVR-Chat] bascom and fastavr
Is anyone aware of the current status of these two compilers?
The Bascom mailing list search function at http://www.grote.net/bascom/index.html has
never worked for me but this compiler seems to have been updated more recently (Dec
2004) than fastavr (21 Feb 2004).
I have tried the demo versions - but both have bugs. Fastavr produces assembler code
with labels so I can (eventually) trace the problems - but Bascom produces only hex/obj
and requires disassembly before I can even start to find why the inbuilt routines don't
work.
I would appreciate any comment on either compiler (don't bother advising me to use c :-)
Geo