> > What I wrote about perception of sounds above 15 kHz was a bit bad > > formulated. What I meant was that those frequencies most likely won't > > make any noticeable difference to the listener. > > OK, understood. For the most part, I might agree. Some "super-audio" > frequencies may be necessary, though. I haven't fooled around with this > idea > yet. For the vast majority of listeners, frequencies above 15Khz are lost. Most people's hearing is severely attenuated above that. However, most discerning listeners can hear these higher frequencies -- perhaps it's why they run around discerning in the first place. My hearing is good to 21Khz but I can hear REALLY loud notes at 25Khz. So can you, and so can your aunt Gertie. In fact, adding a pair of electrostatic tweeter columns can make a day/night difference to a pair of otherwise superb speakers. Mine respond up to 42Khz -- way beyond human hearing -- yet they add a presence that is missing in the titanium dome tweeters that were stock equipment. Those stock guys do very well up to 22Khz (according to a scope and a Behringer mic). Flat and accurate, so where does all this dramatic live-ness come from with the electrostats? I think it's sensed pressure I hear from frequencies in the 22-28Khz range. It's obvious in any A/B test. I've noticed that if I throw HF pink noise (in the 19K+ range) into an ambient-type sample on the Triton, eg waterfalls, it sounds more 'real'. Even my wife hears the difference and her hearing is awful (telephones have more range than her ears). Don't believe what anyone tells you about what you can and can't hear. Everyone is different and just because you can't hear as well above 15 or 16 khz, that does not mean you can't hear 17, 18, or even 25Khz sounds. They just have to be a bit louder for you to perceive them as being as loud as lower notes.
Message
RE: [AN1x] Aliasing
2005-04-17 by Giblet
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.