Jon said: >> >. Never been much of a fan >> > for patch randomizers... >> >> Many folks aren't. However, I find them an intriguing window into > how to get a >> synth to do certain things. Disassembling other people's patches > doesn't teach >> you how to break a synth; a properly designed randomizer does. > > > That's a bit of a stretch for me. I've never found patch randomizers > to be of more than marginal use. I'd rather just program the sound > then sit there hitting enter in the hope something useful might turn > up. Horses for courses...there's room for all approaches in the community, those we agree with and those we don't. >> Windows?! THPHHT ACK ACK ACK ACK! >> > > While I too am a long time Mac enthusiast, please keep in mind this > list is not platform specific - and the Genetix author was/is a > contributing list member of some time. Thanks. See above. I won't argue with anyone who successfully and happily uses a Windows machine to get things done, but I have my own opinions concerning Windows and would hope that they not be misconstrued as an attempt to preach gospel. mike -- As a generalisation, the technology has NOTHING to do with the music. For each specific artist, it has EVERYTHING to do with the music. (cassiel) > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < metlay / atomic city / metlay@... / http://www.atomiccity.com
Message
Re: [AN1x] Re: Quick AN1xEdit question on randomization
2003-05-02 by Mike Metlay
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.