Jerry Aiyathurai said: > Funnily enough, all of those synths are still attractive to me but > particularly the An1X, the Z1 and the K5000. The only thing I would > want a JP8000 for is the feedback oscillator. Everything else about > smacked of trying to recreate the past. By contrast all of these > other synths, brought some digital goodies to the table. I loved OSC 1 on the JP-8000 with all its bizarre waveforms. I wish I could have put it in some other synth. (The Nord Modular comes close with a couple of its oscillators and waveshapers.) > Soapbox on: The AN1X really shines when you explore that space where > the edge parameters are less than 64, the oscillators aren't tuned to > the same pitch, and the filter isn't necessarily low pass. It's not > exactly subtractive synthesis, but not exactly additive either. It's > very AN1X. Soapbox off. :) Yet another person who's "heard into" the AN1x. Bravo! mike -- As a generalisation, the technology has NOTHING to do with the music. For each specific artist, it has EVERYTHING to do with the music. (cassiel) > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < metlay / atomic city / metlay@... / http://www.atomiccity.com
Message
Re: [AN1x] matrix 12
2003-05-01 by Mike Metlay
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.