Is the decay on the pitch envelope the same shape as the decay on the filter envelope? For what it's worth I did a semi-objective test and here are the results. The envelopes aren't different as far as I can tell with the tools I have. However pitch sweeping the the resonant filter with the filter envelope (subjectively) provides a very different sound than pitch sweeping a sine wave (Edge=0) through the same pitch in the same amount of time. This is due partly due to the signal strength at various frequencies. The filter resonance is strong at high filters and fades out at the low frequencies, the oscillator is pretty consistent throughout. For an imitation of a percussive Bwap, I found the oscillator version more interesting. So how did I test the envelopes? Well I set up a pitch sweep (sine wave traversing from 11,835 hertz to 335 hertz in roughly 14 seconds. For the filter sweep, I obtained a resonant sine wave and then traversed it from a pitch of 11,811 hertz to 335 hertz in roughly 14 seconds. (Hertz readings were obtained from a frequency analyzer.) I put the two sweeps side by side in a visual frequency analyzer, and try as I might I could not prove that the pitch envelope was any steeper within the precision of the frequency analyzer's graph. Both sweeps looked relatively exponential. So my instincts were wrong as far as the instrument can tell. Still, I learned two things: - the filter is way louder at higher frequencies. - the pitch envelope sweep is much more satisfying for short blips and bwaps. Why? I don't know. So for plucked string sounds I'll be using the pitch envelope to control sync or fm modulations. Hope this is of interest to someone. Jerry
Message
Re: AN1X Envelope shapes
2003-02-01 by Jerry Aiyathurai <tuskerfort@hotmail.com>
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.