TimoS wrote >> You can use AN1x editor with AN200 but with one disadvantage, you're not able to receive patches from AN200 to AN1x edit but other than that it works just fine. << Yes...I am afraid the PLG150AN card (which is the heart of the AN200) does not support bulk requests. So you can't request patch dumps via AN1xEdit when using the AN200 (or PLG150AN for that matter) >> But then ... you come with AN200 editor and IMO it's the best patch editor I've ever used because it's so clear to understand, the overlay of functions is so great. You can load AN1x banks with it to AN200 so you're able to get advantage of all existing AN1x voices << The AN200/XGworks PLGAN editor is actually constructed from AN1xEdit source code. However there is a change in how Yamaah implemented patch download for auditioning.... An1xEdit basically downloads each audition patch to the AN edit buffer so you can edit and experiment. If you actually want to store the patch to the device user bank, you have save back to the library and then do a bulk send. However, the XGworks editor always downloads the patch data to the user bank and then sends a program cahnge to select the data into the edit buffer. This is not a big deal...but something you should be aware of. I effectively means the XGworks editor is actually overwriting your user bank on the device as you audition voices....which may (or may not) be what you inteded! Regards Gary Gregson Email:gary@... http://www.yme.co.uk/yme
Message
RE: [AN1x-list] Re: An200 vs An1x
2001-07-02 by Gary Gregson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
