The AN200 uses the PLG150AN board for its sound generation. Therefore in general the sound will not be as fat as the AN1x (due to lower poly and scene count). However the PLG150AN does provide some additional oscillator waveforms (including a very rich multi saw) and an additional VCO cross modulation algorithm. These parameters can be used to produce richer voices than can be created on AN1x. Also the AN200 uses XG effects, which are different to those of the AN1x. Hence which machine sounds fatter, really depends on specific patches and the voice/effect programming! Regards Gary Gregson Email:gary@... http://www.yme.co.uk/yme -----Original Message----- From: Thomas [mailto:tomfinegan@...] Sent: 25 June 2001 09:11 To: AN1x-list@yahoogroups.com Subject: [AN1x-list] Does AN200 sounds "fatter"? Someone on sonicstate.com is saying that AN200 sounds fatter than AN1x. Does someone has both and can tell? IMO the only differences are the technical ones with the one more LFO, 5 polyphony and no scene morph for the AN200 (PLG150). But does it sound because of this "fatter"? Regards, Tom
Message
RE: [AN1x-list] Does AN200 sounds "fatter"?
2001-06-25 by Gary Gregson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.