Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

∗Moog Slayer... hehe

--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "Everett" <evy_newt@...> wrote:
>
> I still have a poly with the mood slayer and hawk800 kit. I did the EX with the full upgrade and the only difference I noticed was when doing a fast sweep the AtomaHawk can sound digital. I personally think it's a neat sound, but the original (obviously analog) has no such effect.
>
> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "tim.tashpulatov" <tim.tashpulatov@> wrote:
> >
> > Mike,
> >
> > Thank you for clarification. Does it mean that upon installing HAWK800 upgrade one no longer could use Moog Slayer mod?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Tim,
> > >
> > > The HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk kits combined control Moog Slayer (which is really just extreme resonance).
> > >
> > > But no, the Moog Slayer pots do not need to be three wire.
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@>
> > > To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 5:16:32 AM
> > > Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer pots question
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type.
> > >
> > > My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> >
>