> Off-topic, but I rarely see someone corrected about multiple claims in
> a long post react in a non-defensive hostile manner. Your response to
> being corrected was more impressive than getting the details about
> Jupiters right in the first place would have been.
Well, I always aim to impress...Any impression is a good impression right? Oh no, wait,
that's "press" not "impression"... crap.
Anyway...I'm not exactly sure whether I just got hit with a backhanded compliment, or
more "non-defensive hostility", or a missing grammatical construct somewhere, or what...
but, whatever...no more Jupiter-speak on the korg board!...And get your facts straight
everyone...we don't wan't to piss off the synth gurus do we?
Still really digging this synth...it really likes to take over a mix though and I'm a bit
bummed that the "no-joystick-mod" only partially worked...but at least the pitch is
normal now and I don't have to transpose in my head...although I was kind of getting the
hang of it...
HI MOM!
Later y'all...
-Tim
--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "zoinky420" <zoinky420@...> wrote:
>
> --- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, "serotonic_sound" <sero-tonic@>
> wrote:
> >
> >...thanks for setting me straight.
> >
> >
>
> Off-topic, but I rarely see someone corrected about multiple claims in
> a long post react in a non-defensive hostile manner. Your response to
> being corrected was more impressive than getting the details about
> Jupiters right in the first place would have been.
>