Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

Marcus,

Yes, I went looking through all of my original proposed features and the only one that's left from my original list that is not yet done is the arpeggiator (well velocity sensitivity is another one). So I intend to attack the arpeggiator over the next couple of weeks. There is no doubt in my mind that we'll be able to implement a great one that has all of the best features of all of the arpeggiators out there. All I need is feedback from all of you to know what those great features should be. There's plenty of CPU for the arpeggiator.

Mike.

Marcus Wilson <JB@...> wrote:

payment impressed eh?

let me at that one! paypal? or what is the method of doing this?

i wonder if theres enough CPU to add an arpeggiator to the poly?

;-)

JB over

On 29/12/2007, at 4:42 AM, korgpolyex800 wrote:

I don't mind who is impressed. I'll take official impressed or just
casual impressed. I'll even accept payment impressed. LOL

--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Neil Wakeling <neil@...> wrote:
>
> Incidentally, I am one of those who has done interfacing, coding, and
> produced my own circuit boards (for Atari interfaces), so can I join
the
> list of "officially impressed people" :)
>
> Cheers,
> Neil
>
> korgpolyex800 wrote:
> >
> > In order to get sync mode working with MIDI in (such as from your
> > computer sequencer), I figured it would be useful to have MIDI soft
> > thru available. That way, you can cascade your Poly 800 and EX800
> > without taking up any extra MIDI ports. So I implemented that today
> > and it works OK. Since I used a FIFO (first in first out) to buffer
> > the incoming MIDI (to keep the MIDI interrupt handler as small as
> > possible), there is definitely going to be a delay on the soft thru
> > MIDI. But I was not able to discern any delay with my own ears or
> > looking at MIDI-OX.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

---

Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.