Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] Re: Unison

From: Atom Smasher <atom@...>
Date: 2007-07-15

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, korgpolyex800 wrote:

> I think we definitely want to keep the existing MG and LFO but add a
> second LFO that has square, sine, saw, reverse saw and triangle as well
> as randomize. Plus an inverter.
>
> We will want to be able to route them to VCF cutoff, VCF resonance and
> DCO freq (vibrato) and DCO volume (for lovely tremolo). Any others?
=============

how about making MG (LFO) 1 and 2 targets for MG (LFO) 2?

can detune be a target? or would it sound "zippery" because of the way
that the detune is implemented?

if the new LFO 2 has an inverter, would it need a saw and reverse saw? or
would the reverse saw really be handled by the inverter?

this may be overkill for a poly-800, but would the LFO 2 be free-running?
trigger per note? re-trigger on each new note in a chord? my guess is that
either of the first two options would be good; the third option would be
not so good.


--
...atom

________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/
762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------

"The sum of intelligence on the planet is a constant.
The population is increasing."
-- Cole's Axiom