>The delay control proves useless. I could probly do it better in a
> >different way, but the sound of the delay line being underclocked is
> >just BAD. No distortion, no interestingly brutal signal degredation -
> >just a high pitched buzzing sound.
poo :( I figured it would give some nice aliasing effects. That's what I
did to my 800 II when I modified the delay - messed with the clock. I like
the effect though. I didn't get the clock frequency feeding through to the
output though, jut aliasing.
I've only got room for three knobs with the way I'm laying them out, so this
one will probly be replaced, and maybe the depth as well should it prove
less interesting then wet/dry mix and feedback.
>As for wet/dry and feedback, how would you go about implementing them?
>There
>appears to be some form of raw mixture between the original signal and the
>delayed one near the end, I suppose I could simply add another knob in
>here..
yep
>and then for the feedback I'm clueless. The basic signal path of the chorus
>is as follows: Ne570 stage one, buffer, delay IC, buffer, 570 stage two.
>Where
>would you mix the signal back in? I'd assume the signal would be taken off
>the
>second stage of the Ne570, right before it's mixed with the original, or
>just
>after the second buffer. And ideas?
uh...I don't know about this one....hmmm...
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com