> Okay, let's try an experiment... bring a musician into a room with a
> digital sampler and a VCS3. Have him stand in front of each and
> measure his heartbeat. That would be the Touring Test for musical
> instruments. (I'm kidding. Well, maybe not.)
If you stick me in the same room in front of a set of bagpipes and a
Casio SK1 sampler, I'd go for the sampler. I hate bagpipes.
> Y'know, I'd sure like to say that a digital sampler doesn't belong on
> the Musical Instrument list, but therein lies the issue. Why bother
> with the low end so much? Why be so concerned about what legitimizing
> questionable stuff when you could be making better musical
> instruments?
Did you really just say 'legitimizing questionable stuff' on a mailing
list dedicated to Mellotrons?
> I'm interested in the high end. Where is the research
> to make instruments that are truly cherished by the musician? Where
> is the develoment of something that will enable and inspire the next
> Hendrix or Coltrane?
Probably waiting for the next Hendrix or Coltrane to pick them up.
> There is no Hendrix or Coltrane of the digital sampler, and it's
> really difficult to name a truly great solo played on a digital
> machine.
So why dopes that have anything to do with the instrument? Not all
instruments are built for soloing (mercifully). Are you trying to
contend that if you cannot weedly-weedly away on play an instrument
whilst waggling your tongue at the audience then it mustn't be ∗an
instrument∗ that you're playing? This really is the most wacked-out and
bizarre argument I've heard in years!
> Compare that to the way we on this list gush over the intro
> to "Watcher of the Skies".
Er...∗some∗ of us do. I think it sounds out of tune.
Mike Dickson (
tron@...) M400 #996
The Official Cynic of Streetly Electronics
Streetly Sample Library
http://www.blackcat.demon.co.uk/tron/