Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Mellotronists

previous by date index next by date
  topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [Mellotronists] bias

From: ferrograph@...
Date: 2002-06-07

<< The high frequency of a bias signal simply ensures that the domains are
always kept in motion, negating the effect of inertia at audio frequencies. >>

that's the one. that's the version I was looking for- I sort of knew all that
but I've never been able to sum it up so neatly. cheers for passing that on.
so, how much does one have to slow a 'tron down to hear a whistling noise? I
mean average cloth-eared musicians, not hyper-tense alsatian puppies or bats.
martin, what sort of deck are you making the new tapes on?

the uhers I have don't specify a bias frequency, the revoxes say 120kHz and
my old ferrograph is a mere 63kHz. interesting that this latter still blows
the others away on a good day, with the big a810 not far behind and then the
g36 and one of the uhers.
bias voltages presented to the record head are typically an order of
magnitude greater than the accompanying audio signal, which is why we have
bias traps- to stop the bias getting into the record amplifier and
overdriving it. on the playback side, if they're present, bias traps are
there rather optimistically to protect the output stages from being saturated
at supersonic frequencies; this is more likely to happen through flux linkage
than via tape (! chance'd be a fine thing), especially on multitrack
machines...... and is presumably why there doesn't appear to be an rf trap in
the 'tron's pre-amp. john?

I know. I should get out more.

duncan/m400nr1098 and a load of 1/4" machines