what do you mean with "better for an artist"? it would definite be
better for my finances if I made music that everyone likes...of
course. I always wonder when i hear for an example Jessica Simpson,
does she really like her crap version of "take my breath away"? or
does she just laugh at her way to the bank....I really hope she laugh.
For me in an artistic way i think it´s more important that i like
it...then i of course hope more people likes it so i can get
motivation to make and record more music....but this is no news...or
is it?
--- In Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com, fdoddy@a... wrote:
> Is it better for an artist to make music that someone else thinks is
> good, but the artists thinks it sucks, or is it better for an artist to
> make music that they think is good and everyone else thinks sucks?
>
>
> Fritz
>
> "Hip is a herd mentality" - Joni Mitchell
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lsf5275@a...
> To: tron@b...; Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:25:20 EDT
> Subject: Re: [Mellotronists] Re: MOJO magazine - top 40 prog albums
>
> In a message dated 8/29/2005 7:33:47 P.M. Eastern Standard
Time,
> tron@b... writes:
> That's a bizarre thing to say. If you are going to make music that no
> one can say is good then why make it at all?
>
>
> Interesting question, Mike. I ask myself that all the time.
>
> Frank
>
>
> --------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> ∗ Visit your group "Mellotronists" on the web.
>
> ∗ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Mellotronists-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> ∗ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
> --------