Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Mellotronists

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [Mellotronists] Mellotron dominated recordings

From: "Tony" <atm655@...>
Date: 2007-11-06

You guys must be talking about a remix that I haven't heard.
The original still sounds good to me, but "Aqua" got the treatment and I still like it too.
I'm a lot of things, but subtle isn't one of them.
 
Tony
#510
 
----- Original Message -----
From: lsf5275@...
To: MAinPsych@... ; Mellotronists@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Mellotronists] Mellotron dominated recordings

In a message dated 11/5/2007 10:11:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, MAinPsych@aol. com writes:
For my personal tastes and opinion, the recordings specifically mentioned remain aural fecal matter.
OK so they sound like shit. Is that right? What's with this "aural fecal mater"crap. If you think it sounds like shit, you say... "This recording sound like shit to me... Does it sound like shit to you?"
 
or how about this:
 
"I was listening to it and it sounded somewhat "shit-like." "
 
"After a recent review in my listening room, I happened to notice that this recording sounded like Edgar Froese was passing a load of horse crap."
 
"Tangerine Dream lost it on this recording and released a load of pig vomit on vinyl... with some Mellotron on it."
 
While I mostly like Tangerine Dream, this particular recording sounded like the Pope was gargling penis."
 
How much easier could it be?
 
regards,
 
Dangerine Cream
 
PS: apologies to all you suffering Catholics




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.22/1112 - Release Date: 11/5/2007 7:11 PM