New tracks with CS-80
2007-07-16 by hudson_fall

Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-03-31 22:34 UTC
Thread
2007-07-16 by hudson_fall
2007-07-17 by David Rogoff
> I've just mixed some tracks and put them on www.myspace.com/hudsonfallThanks Adrian - the songs sound good (although, of course, I'd also
> and my cs80 features on 3 of them. Only Lorenzo's dream DOESNT(I caved
> in and used a shitty new Triton). Personally I would have the cs a lot
> higher in the mixes but we are supposed to be a guitar band!
>
2007-07-17 by blchrr@homecall.co.uk
> As for actual music recorded with the CS80, I´d send everyone to my (rather humble) website www.parsick.com to listen to the audio stream playing in the background. At least I´d send those who haven´t been there yet or have ordered the album, that is...
>
> Stephen
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
>
> "Ambition makes you look pretty ugly, kicking squealing Gucci little piggy." (Thom Yorke/Radiohead -- "Paranoid Android")
>
> Finally available: Stephen Parsick -- Traces of the Past Redux, reissued with three previously unreleased bonus tracks.
>
> It´s out: [´ramp] & markus reuter -- "ceasing to exist", a gorgeous dark ambient album. available through our webshop at www.doombient.com
>
> For info and audio, please visit the official [´ramp] website at www.doombient.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Rogoff
> To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [yamahacs80] New tracks with CS-80
>
>
> hudson_fall wrote:
> > I've just mixed some tracks and put them on www.myspace.com/hudsonfall
> > and my cs80 features on 3 of them. Only Lorenzo's dream DOESNT(I caved
> > in and used a shitty new Triton). Personally I would have the cs a lot
> > higher in the mixes but we are supposed to be a guitar band!
> >
> Thanks Adrian - the songs sound good (although, of course, I'd also
> raise the keyboard levels!). I'm in no place to throw stones, spending
> more time inside keyboards than playing them, but it's great to hear
> people using CS80 for actual music! I'd encourage anyone else with
> online music (even cs80v...) to let the group know about it.
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
2007-07-17 by Wavecomputer360
----- Original Message -----
From: David Rogoff
To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:31 AM
Subject: Re: [yamahacs80] New tracks with CS-80
hudson_fall wrote:
> I've just mixed some tracks and put them on www.myspace.com/hudsonfall
> and my cs80 features on 3 of them. Only Lorenzo's dream DOESNT(I caved
> in and used a shitty new Triton). Personally I would have the cs a lot
> higher in the mixes but we are supposed to be a guitar band!
>
Thanks Adrian - the songs sound good (although, of course, I'd also
raise the keyboard levels!). I'm in no place to throw stones, spending
more time inside keyboards than playing them, but it's great to hear
people using CS80 for actual music! I'd encourage anyone else with
online music (even cs80v...) to let the group know about it.
David
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2007-07-17 by Wavecomputer360
----- Original Message -----
From: blchrr@...
To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 10:35 AM
Subject: [yamahacs80] Re: New tracks with CS-80
I like your site Stephen. Is the Doombient site yours too? I quite liked the
drones on there, creates a nice atmosphere.
Is that a Dynacord your using for the long verbs?
> As for actual music recorded with the CS80, I´d send everyone to my (rather humble) website www.parsick.com to listen to the audio stream playing in the background. At least I´d send those who haven´t been there yet or have ordered the album, that is...
>
> Stephen
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> "Ambition makes you look pretty ugly, kicking squealing Gucci little piggy." (Thom Yorke/Radiohead -- "Paranoid Android")
>
> Finally available: Stephen Parsick -- Traces of the Past Redux, reissued with three previously unreleased bonus tracks.
>
> It´s out: [´ramp] & markus reuter -- "ceasing to exist", a gorgeous dark ambient album. available through our webshop at www.doombient.com
>
> For info and audio, please visit the official [´ramp] website at www.doombient.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Rogoff
> To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [yamahacs80] New tracks with CS-80
>
>
> hudson_fall wrote:
> > I've just mixed some tracks and put them on www.myspace.com/hudsonfall
> > and my cs80 features on 3 of them. Only Lorenzo's dream DOESNT(I caved
> > in and used a shitty new Triton). Personally I would have the cs a lot
> > higher in the mixes but we are supposed to be a guitar band!
> >
> Thanks Adrian - the songs sound good (although, of course, I'd also
> raise the keyboard levels!). I'm in no place to throw stones, spending
> more time inside keyboards than playing them, but it's great to hear
> people using CS80 for actual music! I'd encourage anyone else with
> online music (even cs80v...) to let the group know about it.
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2007-07-17 by Quazimodo
--- In yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com, "hudson_fall" <ade_crane@...> wrote:
>
> but we are supposed to be a guitar band!
>
2007-07-17 by Richard
--- In yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com, "hudson_fall" <ade_crane@...> wrote:
>
> I've just mixed some tracks and put them on www.myspace.com/hudsonfall
> and my cs80 features on 3 of them. Only Lorenzo's dream DOESNT(I caved
> in and used a shitty new Triton). Personally I would have the cs a lot
> higher in the mixes but we are supposed to be a guitar band!
>
2007-08-06 by Wayne Griffin
2007-08-09 by ][
>No thoughts as to the safest way (least shock to components)?
> I have a CS-80 that was dormant for perhaps several
> years...
> I was curious if there were any recommendations about
> the initial power-on. Shall I use a VARIAC? Test power
> supply out of circuit first? Please tell me what you
> think.
>