To me the 60 has something different, I can't say it better than "aggressive", I don't know if the only CS60 I could hear live was not calibrated or not but I found that the filters sound a little more dirty and screaming. Of course you miss something , like the Subosc's Speed modulation by aftertouch but you gain something with a little less weigh, a generally more stable behaviour etc. .I know the 60 used by the Germans "Testrauschen" and it sounds wonderful.... PS: you lucky chap.... M ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mert Topel" <mert@...> To: <yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:48 AM Subject: [yamahacs80] Your opinion on CS60 > Have you got any idea why the great CS60 was not popular ever? With > it's monophonic aftertouch, initial velocity, lovely ribbon > controller , ring modulator and 8 polyphony, it should at least be a > tough competitor against the Prophet 5. > > I have owned a P5 for about 9 years and although it sounds interesting > and powerful, the rough pitch and modulation wheels, rather poor > keyboard and lack of velocity and aftertouch makes the precise > controlling of musical expression quite impossible. And it's limited > polyphony makes the P5 a real looser against the CS60 at sustaining > sounds. To me the P5 is not as musical compared to the CS60/80 > > The mighty CS80 makes the CS60 look a small limited synthesizer. But if > we take the CS60 on it's own, it is an incredible synthesizer still. > > I am a lucky owner of a CS80. The CS60 is going to be my next purchase > with it's easier portability for my stage performance. > > BTW, I old my P5 last summer and never miss it. > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [yamahacs80] Your opinion on CS60
2006-04-29 by Max Fazio
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
