Yamaha CS80

Thanks Stephen
What maintainence is required apart from changing PSU tantalium caps  
every 15 years or so?
On 17/03/2009, at 10:58 PM, Wavecomputer360 wrote:

> The fact that the CS50 is the least fancy of the bunch makes it the  
> most reliable. So if it´s working well and gets maintained on a  
> regular basis, keep it. Otherwise sell it to someone who might need  
> it as an organ-donor (I´d get myself a 50 in an instant if I had the  
> chance to buy one locally).
>
> Stephen
>
> __________________________________________________________
>
> "Ambition makes you look pretty ugly, kicking squealing Gucci little  
> piggy." (Thom Yorke/Radiohead -- "Paranoid Android")
>
> Stephen Parsick live in concert: Bochum Planetarium (Germany), 13th  
> of December, 2008, 08:00 pm.
>
> Finally available: Stephen Parsick -- Traces of the Past Redux,  
> reissued with three previously unreleased bonus tracks. For more  
> info please check www.parsick.com
>
> For legal downloads please check:
>
> http://www.musiczeit.com/directory.php?artist=296&title=Stephen 
> +Parsick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David
> To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 7:50 PM
> Subject: [yamahacs80] Should I keep my CS-50
>
> Help me decide to keep my Yamaha CS-50. Im considering getting the
> midi retrofit and keeping it forever...............but
>
> All this talk here about chips blowing up on CS-60 and CS-80 leads me
> to believe that perhaps Yamaha got it wrong in the engineering of
> these two models
> From the posts here the track record seems as bad as the Roland Juno
> 106 voice chip--the question I ask is it all worth it if each time you
> turn on the machine
> you worry about a chip failure?
>
> On the other hand the CS-50 does not seem as flawed in the engineering
> side as the CS-60 or CS-80 looking at the posts
> Have I got this right about the CS-50 ? Its not an engineering failure
> like the CS-60 and CS-80
>
> thanks in advance
> David
>
> http://www.myspace.com/jointhecarcrashset
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]