Yamaha CS80 group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Yamaha CS80

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 20:34 UTC

Message

Re: Arturia..!?

2009-01-18 by slipperysoles

Hey Andrew,

I have an 80V and an 80 and for the fun of it I try to copy patches
from the 80V to the 80 all the time.

Having said that it is not always easy. I agree that the 80V mostly
sounds like a regular VA, however it does have some cool sounds that
do not make use of the additional features of the V and still I can't
get a similiar sound out of the 80. If you want, send me some shots of
your favourite patches and sound clips and I will give it a try.

Cheers
Worsel


--- In yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew" <taoist.hermit1@...> wrote:
>
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Quazimodo
> 
> > I am just on the Arturia CS80 site:
> 
> > http://www.arturia.com/evolution/en/products/cs-80v/intro.html
> 
> > ...and listening to their supposed audio demo.
> 
> > Well I must say that these samples sound nothing like either of my
> > 80's... OK, so there are attempts at some complex modulations
etc.. but
> > the overall *character* of sound is, to my ears anyway, nowhere near..
> 
> > Sounds to me like they could be coming fom any cheap-digital analogue
> > wannabe..!
> 
> 
> This sounds like a good opportunity for a proper AB test.
> 
> I'm listening to the demo sounds now - and I'm inclined to agree
with your 
> comment on the cheap wannabe.  This sounds thinner than my CS80V,
though I 
> use more signal processing as softsynths generally need beefing up a
bit.
> 
> As I have the Arturia CS80V, would you, or someone else in the
group, like 
> to compare some patches?
> 
> Maybe it'd be easiest if I posted a few patches to be copied on a CS80, 
> rather than the other way round, as I can take a screen print of the
patch 
> settings and send that as well, so the exact settings can be
replicated? 
> That'd probably be easier than someone listing their patch settings or 
> photographing their 80.
> 
> Or of course if someone has both the CS80 and the Arturia, that
would be 
> better. :D
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.