I have no plan for designs beyond the standard M board at this time. I need to proof and verify that the basic voice card works "as advertised" so that actually using it to replace broken cards means the machine still sounds like a CS-50/60/80. Later, perhaps I will indulge in different filters, more VCOs, etc. At the moment, my prototype is an old TX-816 rack frame where the TF-1s (DX voice engines) have all been pulled in favor of boards I made to test the M board equivalent circuits. Two M board structures per frame card. I call this thing the CSR-80, because 1) my initials are CSR and 2) it is a CS-(R)ack frame-80. ;) It is not fully operational yet, but it does work after a fashion. The EGs btw are (lowers voice to a mumble) *digital*, using PICs and calculated rate tables similar to the EG-S chip of a DX voice engine. They work very well, and if I didn't tell folks now they're calculated envelopes no one would know without back-tracing the circuit. ;) If it was an EG that needed to have decay/release rates longer than 10sec (attack rates are only 0.1sec to 1sec as per Yamaha design) then I would need more resolution, but this is one area of analog synthesizer voicing where the microcontroller makes a definite improvement. Making a pure discrete analog IG00159 EG was taking far too many parts. Crow /**/ David Rogoff wrote: > Hi Scott. > > It's good to know you're still working on this! Any plans for > additional features beyond the original M-Board? I'd really like to see > a Moog-ladder filter on board. This is one really nice feature of > Arturia's VST. Also, two, tunable VCOs per board would be great. It > would let you have much more flexibility than the fixed tunings of the > Feet selectors and give a massive four VCOs per note! > > David > >
Message
Re: Crow's replacement M-boardRe: [yamahacs80] Re: Did any of your CS80 *restorations* involve new IC's...?
2007-09-25 by Scott Rider
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
